I started 2018 peering down my microscope at a sample that I collected whilst in Bulgaria back in the summer. I have written about my trip to the Pirin mountains before (see “Desmids from the Pirin mountains”) but the diatom sample that I collected from Lake Popovo had remained unexamined since I got back.
I had waded into the littoral zone of this steep-sided corrie lake and picked up a few of the smaller stones, which I had then scrubbed with the toothbrush stowed in my rucksack to remove the thin film of diatoms. These, like most of the algae that I collect on my travels, get treated to a bath in local spirits to ease the journey back to the UK. This is not an ideal preservative for soft-bodied algae but is not a problem when your primary interest is diatoms with their tough silica cell walls. Once I got back, I had them prepared and mounted ready for inspection, but then got distracted by other things and have only just got around to having a proper look.
The two most abundant taxa were the Achnanthidium minutissimum complex (probably at least three species) and Cymbella excisiformis. Together, these constituted over eighty per cent of all the diatoms in the sample. Ten years ago, I would have called the organism I was calling Cymbella excisiformis by a different name, Cymbella affinis, but opinions have shifted more than once. The original Diatomeen im Süsswasser-Benthos von Mitteleuropa has images of C. affinis that are actually C. tumidula, and also describes C. excisa as a separate species. However, the most recent view is that C. affinis and C. excisa are two names for the same species, with C. affinis taking precedence. To confuse matters yet further, the population illustrated below shows a gradation of features from “C. affinis” to “C. excisiformis”, suggesting that the use of length:width as a discriminating factor is over simplistic. Krammer tried to explain his rationale for distinguishing between these species in his 2002 monograph but he uses the name “C. excisa” for the organism called “C. affinis” in our 2017 English edition. Confused? You will be ….
“Cymbella excisiformis” from Lake Popovo, Pirin Mountains, Bulgaria, August 2017. Based on Lange-Bertalot et al. (2017)’s criteria of length:breadth 4.2-5.3 in C. excisiformis compared to 3.1 – 3.8 in C. affinis, images a., b. and c. are C. excisiformis whilst d., e., f. and g. are C. affinis. Scale bar: 10 micrometres (= 1/100th of a millimetre).
This is another good example of points that I have made several times before: that we should always try to identify populations rather than single cells, and that we should treat dimensions stated in the literature as indicative rather than definitive (see “More about Gomphonema vibrio”). Length:width, in particular, can change a lot during the life-cycle of the diatom.
Species of Gomphonema were also present in the sample. Though not numerically abundant (none constituted more than one per cent of the total count), they included some large cells which, in addition, have extensive mucilaginous stalks, so their contribution to total biomass is greater than their low abundance suggests. I’ll write more about the ecology of these species in the next post. Finally, I also found other Cymbella species, as well as some Encyonema and Encyonopsis, and a few valves of Eucocconeis flexella, a relative of Achnanthidium and Cocconeis which has a distinctive diagonal raphe.
Gomphonema spp. from Lake Popovo, Pirin mountains, Bulgaria, August 2017. h., i.: G. acuminatum; j.: G. truncatum; k.: unidentified girdle view; l.: G. pumilum. Scale bar: 10 micrometres (= 1/100th of a millimetre).
There is, at this point in time, no official Bulgarian method for assessing the ecological status of lakes using diatoms so I have evaluated Lake Popovo as if it were a low alkalinity lake in the UK instead. Using the method we developed, this one sample has an Ecological Quality Ratio of 0.92, which puts it on the border between high and good status. Looking around the lake, I see no reason why it should not be firmly in high status but, at the same time, I am using an evaluation method that was designed for lakes 2000 kilometres away, so maybe we should not expect perfect results. However, I have performed similar exercises at other lakes far from the UK and also got similar results (see “Lago di Maggiore under the microscope”) which points to a basic robustness in this approach.
The outflow of Lake Popovo leads into a cascade that ends in the first of a series of lakes, the “Fish Popovski” lakes. I wrote about the desmids in this lake back in September (see “”Desmids from the Pirin mountains”) and will return to this sample in order to describe the diatoms in another post. But, meanwhile, the assemblage at Popovo reminded me of the littoral algae in another lake that I really should tell you about …
Miscellaneous diatoms from Lake Popovo, Pirin mountains, Bulgaria, August 2017. m.: Cymbella sp.; n.: Encyonema neogracile; o. and p.: Eucocconeis flexella (raphe valve and girdle view respectively). Scale bar: 10 micrometres (= 1/100th of a millimetre).
Lake Popovo, photographed from close to the location from which my sample was collected. The brass plate on the rock at the right hand side gives the altitude as 2234 metres above sea level. The photograph at the top of the post shows Lake Popovo against a backdrop of the Pirin mountains.
Hofmann, G., Werum, M. & Lange-Bertalot, H. (2011). Diatomeen im Süßwasser-Benthos von Mitteleuropa. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Rugell.
Krammer, K. (2002). Diatoms of Europe volume 3: Cymbella. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell, Germany.
Lange-Bertalot, H., Hofmann, G., Werum, M. & Cantonati, M. (2017). Freshwater Benthic Diatoms of Central Europe: Over 800 Common Species Used In Ecological Assessment (edited by M. Cantonati, M.G. Kelly & H. Lange-Bertalot). Koeltz Botanical Books, Schmitten-Oberreifenberg.
The UK lake diatom assessment method is described in:
Bennion, H., Kelly, M.G., Juggins, S., Yallop, M.L., Burgess, A., Jamieson, J. & Krokowski, J. (2014). Assessment of ecological status in UK lakes using benthic diatoms. Freshwater Science 33: 639-654.
Details of the calculation can be found in the UK TAG method statement.