Swimming in a sea of ignorance …

The American quantum physicist John Archibald Wheeler once said: “We live on an island of knowledge surrounded by a sea of ignorance.  As our island of knowledge grows, so does the shore of our ignorance”.   He was talking metaphorically but, last week, I stood on the shore of a sea loch in Argyll with a very literal interpretation of Wheeler’s words churning through my mind.   Most of us gaze at the surface of the sea with very little sense of what lies beneath.  What we do know comes mostly from natural history documentaries which, in turn, tend to focus on the extremes of the biological world, whether in terms of bizarreness, anthropomorphism, violence or beauty.    We may paddle in rock pools and get a sense from what is exposed at low tide of a fecund underwater world, but rarely get – or take – the opportunity to enter into that world ourselves.  

In many ways, that encapsulates my creed for this blog: finding the extraordinary that lurks right under our noses without us noticing.   But most of my posts are about the freshwater world and, when it comes to marine life, my island of knowledge is small, and the surrounding sea of ignorance is vast.   However, last week I had an opportunity to rectify that and, after squeezing into a wet suit and donning a mask, snorkel and flippers, I slipped into Loch Caolisport, on the west coast of the Kintyre peninsula in Argyll.   “Slipped” is, perhaps, disingenuous: it was more of an undignified crawl, due to the awkwardness that flippers confer on the hitherto straightforward act of walking.  As soon as I was a few metres from land and able to push off and float in the water, however, I became part of this new world.   

The first impression is of the extraordinary quantity and variety of the seaweeds on the seabed.  We are used to seeing a narrow fringe of exposed seaweeds, floppy and flattened on rocky shores when the tide is out; we are less used to seeing them buoyant and supported by the water.  But seaweeds, like many amphibious organisms, are as elegant in one medium as they are awkward in another.  Think how ungainly a seal is when it hauls itself on land, yet how sleek they are when seen swimming underwater.   The kelps were in their natural habitat whilst I was the ungainly intruder.  

Laminaria digitata dominating the kelp beds in the shallow waters off Loch Caolisport, Argyll, Scotland, July 2021.

Brown seaweeds clearly dominated the assemblages but many of the growths of sea oak (Halidrys siliquosa) were covered with tufts of a red alga Ceramium.   I saw crusts of the red alga Hildenbrandia (a relative is common in rivers: see “More about red algae”) and there were a few tufts of green algae too. The wracks, the seaweeds I most associate with rocky shores, were, by contrast, noticeable by their absence.  They are mostly species of the intertidal zone and the areas that I was swimming through were permanently submerged.   Further away – too far for a timid first-time snorkeller to contemplate – there were beds of sea grass that others in our party explored.

Sea oak, Halidrys siliquosa with epiphytic Ceramium in the shallow waters off Loch Caolisport, Argyll, Scotland, July 2021.

Rising above the other algae were graceful fronds of another brown alga, Sargassum muticum.  Some of these were almost two metres tall, with a central stem and many laterals, each divided several times to give a fern-like appearance.  Closer inspection revealed the presence of many small air bladders (“aerocysts”) which make the whole plant buoyant.  These bladders are, in a way, equivalent to tree trunk as both share a primary purpose of raising the plant above the other vegetation to capture as much light as possible.  

The curiosity of Sargassum muticum, however, is that it shouldn’t be here at all.   It is an invasive species, originally from Japan, that has spread around the world, possibly as the Pacific Oyster was introduced for cultivation.   The first record of S. muticum in the UK was in 1973, but it is now widespread.   However, the first time snorkeller may be forgiven for not knowing this: for them it is one more constituent of these magical underwater gardens.   You don’t know that it should not be there, unless someone tells you this.   You cannot depend entirely on sensations to make judgements about the environment; you need information too.  More particularly, in this case, you need evidence that it was once absent.  I recall a similar circumstance, walking with a friend on a riverbank near our home in Durham.   She had grown up seeing riverbanks bordered by dense stands of Himalayan Balsam (Impatians glandulifera) and had no idea that these, too, were recent arrivals, only becoming widespread in the last 30 years or so.   I had experienced the change; she was dependent on other people’s testimony.   Some older marine biologists must remember these waters before Sargassum muticum intruded but, for most, it has become just one more fixture in the underwater panoramas that greet the intrepid explorer of Argyll’s fecund fringe.

Sargassum muticum in shallow waters off Loch Caolisport, Argyll, Scotland 2021.
A detail of the fronds of Sargassum muticum in Loch Caolisport showing aerocysts.   Photograph by Heather Kelly.

Note

The picture at the top of this post shows Claggain Bay on the west coast of Islay, not Loch Caolisport.  It is hard to take good photographs of water bodies from a low standpoint and there was a rocky promontory at Claggain Bay that afforded a fine view across, whereas the immediate surroundings of our location beside Loch Caolisport had relatively low relief.  

Thanks, too, to Paul Brazier for gently correcting some of my original identifications.

Some other highlights from this week:

Wrote this whilst listening to:   Amy Winehouse.  The 10th anniversary of her death.  

Cultural highlights:  Rewatched Quentin Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood (see below)

Currently reading:  Quentin Tarantino’s novelisation of Once Upon A Time in Hollywood.  Cleverly written in a faux-pulp fiction style, it actually serves as a “Director’s Cut” for the film, adding in some extra background details about the characters.

Culinary highlight: Islay single malt whisky (see above).

The circle of life …

I’m a long way from my regular hunting grounds for this post.  The photograph above shows ponds at King’s Dike Nature Reserve on the site of a former brick works near Peterborough.   It’s some way from Chris Carter’s regular haunts too, but a contact passed on some material which he examined under his microscope, and found a population of Cymbella neocistula, including a perfectly-aligned auxospore.   Over the many years that I have been writing this blog, I don’t think that I have ever talked in detail about the life-cycle of diatoms and this sample presents not just an opportunity to do this, but also to draw your attention to a wonderful new book on diatoms.  

The picture below shows a living cell (left) and five cleaned “valves” (i.e. half the silica cell wall) in order of increasing size.   If images of almost any other plant or animal was presented in this way, you would probably assume that the youngest (i.e. smallest) were on the left, and the oldest (i.e. largest) were on the right.  In the case of diatoms, however, the opposite is true.  Diatoms are living embodiments of The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, with young cells being larger than the older ones.  In the case of diatoms, gradual reduction in size with successive generations is a consequence of how diatom cells divide.   Think of a diatom cell as a Petri dish with two overlapping halves, one slightly larger than the other.   When the cell divides both the upper and lower valves become the upper valves of the two daughter cells.  This means you have one cell which is the same size as the parent, and one which is slightly smaller    Repeat this several times, and the average size of the population will inevitably decrease.  Obviously, this sequence generating ever-decreasing cell size cannot proceed for ever so at some point, sexual reproduction is triggered and, freed temporarily from the constraint of a rigid cell wall, a larger cell can form.  Details of the internal “trigger” are hazy, but I like to think of it as analogous to the implications for humans of tight y-fronts

A live cell (left) and five cleaned valves of Cymbella cf neocistula from pond at King’s Dike Nature Reserve.  Photographs: Chris Carter.   10 micrometres = 1/100th of a millimetre.  The picture at the top of the post shows the ponds at King’s Dike, taken by Jonathan Graham.  

In order to place this into context, I have included a diagram from a new book, The Amazing World of Diatomsby Masahiku Idei, Shinya Sato and David Mann, which is packed full of (mostly) electron micrograph images showing the range of forms of diatoms.   The picture shows the life cycle of pennate diatoms, and runs anti-clockwise.   At the bottom you can see an “auxospore”, the end result of two gametes coming together to form a zygote.   Chris noticed an auxospore of Cymbella neocistula during his investigations and took photographs at four different focal planes to show the structure. At the top left of the next plate the focus is on one of the two parent cells then, zigzagging right and then left, you see the large auxospore underneath and, finally, bottom right, there is the lower of the two parent cells.  

The life-cycle of a pennate diatom: Fig. 6 from The Amazing World of Diatoms by Masahiku Idei, Shinya Sato and David Mann
A “stack” of images showing an auxospore of Cymbella neocistula sandwiched between two parent cells.   Photographs: Chris Carter.   10 micrometres = 1/100th of a millimetre.  

How long does all this take?   There is some evidence that many diatoms in temperate rivers have a two-year life cycle (see “Diminishing with age …” and “Diatoms and the space-time continuum”) but there is still much that we don’t know.   The study of algae and other “lower” plants was once referred to as “cryptogamic botany” with the word “cryptogam” meaning “hidden reproduction”.   Sex in diatoms is certainly not as in-your-face as that of larger orchids but it is there and happening under our very noses.  I’ve mentioned elsewhere that “seeing” is something that we do with pre-conditioned brains, as much as with our eyes (most recently in “The bluffer’s guide to Tabellaria“), and spotting the sexual stages of diatoms is a good case of this.  It is not helped, too, by the tradition of focussing attention on “cleaned” (i.e. dead) valves rather than living cells.   Perhaps it is less a case of “cryptogamic botany” and more to do with diatomists behaving as if they are Victorian maiden aunts of the botanical world, refusing to acknowledge the truth of what is taking place right in front of their noses.

Taxonomic note:

I’ve called the diatom featured in this post “Cymbella cf neocistula” because some aspects (number of stigmata, shape of central area) of some valves do not correspond entirely with the description.  There may be more than one species present, or it may be that the literature does not fully capture the scale of variation possible within populations.   

Reference

The Amazing World of Diatoms by Masahiku Idei, Shinya Sato and David Mann is available from Amazon.  You can buy the printed version from https://amzn.to/3wMtjtt but it is also possible to buy a Kindle version from other Amazon sites.

Some other highlights from this week:

Wrote this whilst listening to:   nightlife in Bowmore.   Not exactly a throbbing metropolitan hub of Bacchanalian pleasure, but the little that is happening does seem to be taking place right outside our bedroom window.

Cultural highlights:  We’re on the Isle of Islay in the Inner Hebrides, so the highlights for me have to be the distilleries.   Bowmore is about 200 m away, and Bruichladdich is visible on the other side of Loch Indaal.   Kilochoman deserves special mention for a very fine oat milk flat white whilst Ardberg loses points for an underpowered Americano (I understand other liquid refreshment is available at both locations).

Currently reading:  In a Lonely Place by Dorothy B. Hughes, 1940s crime noir in a Raymond Chandleresque setting and style which, I am sure, must have inspired Patricia Highsmith’s dark Ripley novels.

Culinary highlight: Islay single malt whisky (see above).

Cassop Pond in June

It seems like a long while since I have written about Cassop Pond (see “Cassop Pond in May”).   As earlier posts have shown, a lot can happen between two visits, so I was curious to see what had changed.   One of the leitmotifs of this blog is that you can never know the algae in any habitat from a single visit: you need to go back in different seasons to understand how they change.  Even then, you end up with a picture of how they change over the course of a single year, without any absolute guarantee that the same patterns will repeat in future years.   A sample or an observation, in other words, represents a point in space and time.  More than that, it represents a decision on the part of the observer.   Even a small pond such as this (only 0.36 hectares, according to the Environment Agency’s Catchment Data Explorer) has myriad habitats that could be explored by a microscopist.  

My June visit took me back to the flocs of the aquatic liverwort, Riccia fluitans, that I wrote about in Working their passage, and illustrated in Pond Politics.   These flogs are still prolific in the margins, and often share the habitat with duckweed, Lemna minor.   However, my June samples also showed a considerable quantity of blanket weed, Cladophora glomerata, entwined amongst the Riccia fronds.   These were definitely not prolific when I last looked, but that was three months ago and the warmer weather we’ve had since then will have encouraged growth of Cladophora.   

Riccia fluitans flocs in the margin of Cassop Pond, June 2021. 

There were some typical branched filaments of Cladophora in a healthy state and relatively free of epiphytes; however, there were also many dead or decaying filaments smothered in epiphytes.   This is quite unusual, as Cladophora can normally support large populations of epiphytes without appearing to suffer.    Moreover, most of the epiphytes that I could see were Epithemia sorex, the nitrogen-fixing diatom which I wrote about in Working their passage.  I’ve not seen this species growing directly on Cladophora before either.   

Top: A filament of Cladophora glomerata from Riccia fluitans flocs in Cassop Pond, June 2021; bottom: a dead filament of C. glomerata smothered in epiphytes from the same floc.  Scale bar: 20 micrometres (= 1/50th of a millimetre)

Cladophora glomerata often takes over a habitat, living up to its common name of “blanket weed”.   I’m wondering if, in this particular habitat at this time of year, it has met its match.   There is evidence in the literature of Cladophora growth being limited by nitrogen, which probably says more about the diversity of habitats within which Cladophora is found than being a fundamental truth about Cladophora itself.  What we can say is that, rather than being the insidious “weed” that blights so many rivers and ponds, it seems to be a distant third, after Riccia fluitans and Epithemia sorex, in the race for dominance at Cassop Pond.

That, too, gets me intrigued to see what will have happened next time I visit Cassop.   If it is so clearly losing in the struggle to acquire nutrients in June then, maybe, it will have disappeared in July.  Then again, maybe conditions will have changed and it will have surged past Riccia fluitans and Epithemia.  Who knows?

References

Lohman, K. and Priscu, J.C. (1992).  Physiological indicators of nutrient deficiency in Cladophora(Chlorophyta) in the Clark Fork of the Columbia River Montana. Journal of Phycology 28: 443-448. 

Millner, G.C., Sweeney, R.A. & Frederick,V.R. (1982).  Biomass and distribution of Cladophora glomerata in relation to some physical-chemical Variables at two sites in Lake Erie.  Journal of Great Lakes Research 8: 35-41. 

Some other highlights from this week:

Wrote this whilst listening to:   Floating Point with Pharoah Sanders and the London Symphny Orchestra collaboration Promises.    Intriguing blend of electronica/ambient, jazz and classical music.

Cultural highlights:  Enjoying the Channel 4 comedy series This Way Up, starring Aisling Bea.

Currently reading:  Fortress Plant by Dale Waters.   A fairly stolid description of the many ways that higher plants repel grazers and pathogens.    And rereading John Bunyan’s Pilgrim’s Progress.

Culinary highlight: Has to be fish and chips in Tynemouth, sitting on a bench overlooking the beach.   Celebrating (in reverse order) my youngest son’s release from quarantine and completion of his philosophy degree.

Winning ways: Erasmo Macaya

The last interview in this series on tips for taking great photos of algae is with Erasmo Macaya, Associate Professor at the Department of Oceanography at the Universidad de Concepción in Chile.   Erasmo won the competition in 2010 and was shortlisted in 2020.   Erasmo’s photographs support his research on the seaweeds of the southern oceans as well has having artistic integrity in their own right.   Photos illustrating his range show apical tips of Macrocystis pyrifera at the surface in Wellington, New Zealand (top of post), a forest of Macrocystis pyrifera at Yendegaia Fjord, Southern Chile (below this paragraph), macroalgal diversity (Palmaria, Desmarestia, Adenocystis) in an intertidal pool on the Antarctic Peninsula (midway through the interview) and, finally, the brown alga Splachnidium rugosum from the shallow subtidal atRobinson Crusoe Island, Juan Fernández Archipelago, Chile.

  • “Decisive moment” or carefully planned composition?
    I would say both (particularly in the field), you can suddenly get into a nice underwater (or intertidal) landscape or species, with a beautiful color combination, cool lights and shadows, etc. But you can also wait and have the composition according to movement, underwater visibility, species diversity, daytime, etc.

    I recommend taking as many photos as you can for the same alga or the underwater landscape, now with digital cameras and memory card capacity, is not a problem, then you can choose the right one. Also try different angles, with some algae especially the large ones, pointing your camera towards the surface might get nice light and colors.
  • What photo editing software do you use?
    Adobe Photoshop.
  • What routine editing steps do you apply to your image (e.g. cropping, adjusting levels/curves/brightness etc, stitching, stacking)?
    I like the “levels tool”, because it can help you to get the right exposure and color for your photo.
  • Do you ever “retouch” images to remove blemishes and improve their appearance?
    Usually levels adjustments only.
  • How important are the title and legend when you present an image?
    I usually play a little bit with the title, it can be more “scientific” or just a nice couple of words describing the subject in the image. But always in the legend you give more information from the equipment used to the scientific names, place, biology, among others. 
  • Are there any photographers who particularly inspire you?
    In Chile we have really good underwater photographers, Eduardo Sorensen is in my opinion one of the best (https://www.instagram.com/eduardo.sorensen/), I really enjoy his work. Also, Mauricio Altamirano, Paula González Valderrama and Fernando Olivares are doing a really good job showing our marine biodiversity and underwater beauty.
  • And, finally, who’s going to win Copa America 2020?
    I would like to say Chile, but Brazil has a very good and strong team, they might win.