Hardly had my field kit dried out following my trip to west Cumbria than I was loading it back into the car for a trip to the Ribble valley. I’m involved in a small project to develop a citizen science tool for assessing algae in rivers, along with Bill Brierley of the Freshwater Biological Association and Katrina Woodhead, a student at Lancaster University, and Leanne Trough of Ribble Rivers Trust. We’re looking at streams with different levels of human impact, using the RiverFly method to assess invertebrates and a simplified version of RAPPER (see “The democratisation of stream ecology”) to assess river health.
One of the sites we visited was on the River Hodder, a tributary of the Ribble, which flows off the Forest of Bowland and eventually joins the Ribble just downstream from Clitheroe. There are no major settlements on the Hodder and, as a result, it is a relatively clean river, with one of the best salmon, trout and grayling fisheries in the country. On this particular occasion there was a lot of filamentous algae visible but, following the long period of warm weather and low flows, this was not a great surprise. The big interest here was a few patches of freshwater sponge on submerged bedrock on the far side of the river from where we were working. They formed distinct patches on the rock, with a green tinge (due to endosymbiotic Chlorella-like algae) and which yielded slightly when pressed with a finger.
Sponges are very primitive organisms. There is a well-known trope that if a sponge is passed through a sieve, the individual cells will reform into a new sponge, suggesting some basic cell-to-cell communication (see video here). Inside the sponge there is also a “scaffold” of long, thin silica “spicules” which give the sponge some structural integrity and which are also useful for identification. There are only about half a dozen sponges from freshwaters in the UK and Ireland (there are, by comparison, about 300 sponges in marine habitats). Based on the spicule morphology, I think that the sponge we found was Ephydatia fluviatilis.
Identification requires a microscope in order to examine the spicules. By the time I got home, the green-tinged portions that I had scraped off the stones were beige whilst the overlying water in the vial was green with suspended algae, which suggested that the association was very loose. There is, however, evidence that the sponges are actively switching genes on and off to encourage the algae to join them. Maybe is more going on than, perhaps, we first assume. Studies have shown that the algae do not meet all the energy requirements of freshwater sponges and prolific growths such as those we saw in the Hodder also depend on the sponges’ ability to filter particles from the water. That, in turn, translates into a broader ecosystem benefit. Removing particulate matter helps preserve the crystal-clear water that the Hodder’s fish need to thrive.
This begs a rather obvious question: how good are sponges at cleaning rivers? It will depend how much sponge is growing in the river and how dirty the water is, but all that filtration must have some effect? On the other hand, whilst we know the Hodder to be a clean river, sponges are not restricted to unpolluted rivers. A study in Ireland indicated that Ephydatia fluviatilis is as likely to be found in rivers below good ecological status as they were to be found in high or good status rivers. Only one of the sponges included in this study (Racekiela ryderi) was largely restricted to clean waters. It would be unwise to use sponges on their own as indicators of the quality of a river. That is, however, a very utilitarian view. Sponges are curious and ancient organisms which are largely overlooked by casual naturalists. They are worth watching out for whenever you are wading in a river or at the edge of a lake.
References
Cocchiglia, L., Kelly-Quinn, M., & Lucey, J. (2013). Classification of freshwater sponge collection at EPA Kilkenny. Environmental Protection Agency, Johnstown Castle, Co. Wexford, Ireland, 31.https://www.epa.ie/publications/research/biodiversity/Classification-of-freshwater-sponges.pdf
Evans, K. L., & Montagnes, D. J. (2019). Freshwater sponge (Porifera: Spongillidae) distribution across a landscape: environmental tolerances, habitats, and morphological variation. Invertebrate Biology, 138: e12258.
Hall, C., Camilli, S., Dwaah, H., Kornegay, B., Lacy, C., Hill, M. S., & Hill, A. L. (2021). Freshwater sponge hosts and their green algae symbionts: a tractable model to understand intracellular symbiosis. PeerJ, 9: e10654.
Jensen, K. S., & Pedersen, M. F. (1994). Photosynthesis by symbiotic algae in the freshwater sponge, Spongilla lacustris. Limnology and Oceanography 39: 551-561.
Lucey, J., & Cocchiglia, L. (2014). Distribution of sponges (Porifera: Spongillidae) in southern Irish rivers and streams. In Biology and Environment: Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 114: 89-100).
Some other highlights from this week:
Wrote this whilst listening to: All of us Flames by Ezra Furman.
Currently reading: Suite Française by Irène Némirovsky.
Cultural highlight: Sally Potter’s 1992 film interpretation of Virginia Woolf’s Orlando.
Culinary highlight: very good takeaway pizza from Flint Pizza in Heaton [https://www.flintpizza.co.uk], eaten al fresco in Heaton Park