Three weeks ago, I speculated that the success of some green algae in rivers may be due to the presence of cyanobacterial mats (see “The man who stares at algae …”) after noticed Mougeotia filaments growing out of darker patches that turned out to be Microcoleus autumnalis. I’ve followed this up with an illustration, made with Adobe Fresco on my iPad, to show what this may look like in situ, as a complement to the micrograph that I showed in the earlier post. As I have stressed before (see “Do we see through a microscope?”), many interventions are necessary to observe a stream alga at high magnification, and the result will inevitably be different to the actuality on the bed of the stream. My illustration is offered as an alternative version of “different to the actuality” and as a thought experiment in how green algal communities may persist in flowing water.
I’ve tried to show the individual filaments of Micocoleus autumnalis wrapping over and around the Mougeotiafilaments which are growing up into the current. The absence of diatoms is deliberate as neither of these genera typically have many epiphytes when in a healthy state.
This observation answers the question of how Mougeotia attaches to rock but only by raising a further question: how does Microcoleus autumnalis attach to rock? The literature is quite vague on this question too, with the following explanation based partly on an old study on a completely different cyanobacterium, Pleurocapsa. This suggested that the outer layer of the cell wall, the “F layer”, is semi-elastic and has a fibrous structure. When in contact with a surface, it flares out to create a greater area of contact. Other sources suggest that mucilage production plays a role too (acting as a form of glue) and we also need to consider the roughness of the surface too. Importantly, a mat like growth form that hugs the contours of the rock exists within a “boundary layer” where it is protected from the current. A big organism such as myself may be buffeted by the current, but there is a millimetre-thick zone just above the rock surface where friction reduces this current to almost zero, creating a zone where M. autumnalis can thrive.
I offer this loose association as one example of how algae thrive in rivers. It is not a universal explanation – it just seems to work for this particular pair of species at this particular location on this particular visit. For a brief period, the unique properties of one cyanobacterium and one green algae overlap for long enough for them to thrive together. Then a spate may come, roll the stones and scour everything back. The next scientist to stare intently at the bed of this river may see something completely different. And their conclusion is just as likely to be right as mine.
References
Davey, M. C., Davidson, H. P. B., Richard, K. J., & Wynn-Williams, D. D. (1991). Attachment and growth of Antarctic soil cyanobacteria and algae on natural and artificial substrata. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 23: 185-191.
Waterbury, J. B., & Stanier, R. Y. (1978). Patterns of growth and development in pleurocapsalean cyanobacteria. Microbiological reviews, 42: 2-44.
Some other highlights from this week:
Wrote this whilst listening to: Vintage Neil Young. Harvest and then Zuma.
Currently reading: Sweet Cares by William Boyd.
Cultural highlight: Living Soil exhibition in the John Hope Gateway at the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh. As the name suggests, the exhibition, based on a residency by Natalie Taylor, focuses on soil but it included a table set with diatom-themed tableware.
Culinary highlight: Sichuan hotpot at Happiness 2 in Durham. A benefit of living in a town with many Chinese students is that we now have two restaurants catering for their tastes.
Two images of the diatom-themed exhibit from Living Soil at the Royal Botanic Garden in Edinburgh.